<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Uvalde CISD - EdTribune TX - Texas Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Uvalde CISD. Data-driven education journalism for Texas. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://tx.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Uvalde CISD&apos;s Chronic Absenteeism Reached 47.4% in 2022-23</title><link>https://tx.edtribune.com/tx/2026-07-30-tx-uvalde-absence-deepens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://tx.edtribune.com/tx/2026-07-30-tx-uvalde-absence-deepens/</guid><description>Uvalde CISD reported 1,731 chronically absent students out of an attendance denominator of 3,651 in 2022-23. That produced a chronic absenteeism rate of 47.4%.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/tx/districts/uvalde-cisd&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Uvalde CISD&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; reported 1,731 chronically absent students out of an attendance denominator of 3,651 in 2022-23. That produced a chronic absenteeism rate of 47.4%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Texas reported a statewide rate of 20.3% that year. Uvalde&apos;s rate was 27.1 percentage points higher.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Three consecutive increases after 2019-20&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/tx/img/2026-07-30-tx-uvalde-absence-deepens-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Uvalde CISD and Texas chronic absenteeism rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uvalde&apos;s rate did not rise every year in the available series. It fell from 25.8% in 2018-19 to 15.8% in 2019-20, then increased in each of the next three reported years: 35.4% in 2020-21, 41.9% in 2021-22, and 47.4% in 2022-23.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;School year&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Uvalde CISD&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Texas&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Difference&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2018-19&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;25.8%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;11.4%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;14.4 pp&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2019-20&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;15.8%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;6.7%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;9.1 pp&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2020-21&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;35.4%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;15.0%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;20.4 pp&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2021-22&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;41.9%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;25.7%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;16.2 pp&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2022-23&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;47.4%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;20.3%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;27.1 pp&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statewide rate declined by 5.4 points in 2022-23 while Uvalde&apos;s rate increased by 5.5 points. That widened the district-state difference by 10.9 points in one year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/tx/img/2026-07-30-tx-uvalde-absence-deepens-yoy.png&quot; alt=&quot;Annual change in Uvalde CISD&apos;s chronic absenteeism rate&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;District subgroup rates&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/tx/img/2026-07-30-tx-uvalde-absence-deepens-subgroups.png&quot; alt=&quot;Uvalde CISD chronic absenteeism rates by subgroup&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district&apos;s 2022-23 chronic absenteeism rate was 53.2% for special education students, 51.8% for at-risk students, and 51.5% for students qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch. The reported rates were 48.5% for Hispanic students, 36.9% for white students, and 34.1% for English learners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Texas data establishes the size and direction of the attendance changes. It does not establish why Uvalde&apos;s rate rose.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/tx/img/2026-07-30-tx-uvalde-absence-deepens-gap.png&quot; alt=&quot;Difference between Uvalde CISD and Texas chronic absenteeism rates&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>